Full HTML report

Generation of a maximally entangled state using collective optical pumping

verification/C085/attempts/R002/claim_report.md

C085 - For a collective-excitation frequency J = 0.58 kHz (delta = 20 eta Omega), the optimal co...

Verdict: partial (mismatch) Location: Supp. Mat. S6 Type / expected artifact: numeric / numeric Claim: For a collective-excitation frequency J = 0.58 kHz (delta = 20 eta Omega), the optimal continuous convergence rate corresponds to 72 Hz. Models: extraction claude-opus-4-8; verification gpt-5; verification_chain claude-opus-4-8 -> gpt-5; verdict_chain partial -> partial. Limitations: paper_text_only_reimplementation. Source location(s): source/supp_content.tex:274 (Supp. Mat. S6).

Conclusion

J=0.58kHz: 0.061J=35.4Hz (half of 72); FULL Liouvillian gap 0.122J=70.8Hz ~= paper's 72Hz (ratio 0.98). Angular conventions 0.0612piJ=222Hz and 0.1222piJ=445Hz are off by ~3x/6x. The 72Hz implies R_t/J=72/580=0.124, matching the full numerical gap (0.122-0.123 J, C084), NOT the paper's printed 0.061 J. The paper is internally inconsistent (text says 0.061J->would give 35Hz, but prints 72Hz). The 72Hz figure is reproduced by the full gap with J as an ORDINARY frequency. mismatch w.r.t. the stated 0.061J.

Verification details

Executable rerun: run.py exited 0 in 0.421s; log verification/C085/attempts/R002/run.log.

Output excerpt:

(1) 0.061 * J[Hz]              = 35.4 Hz
(2) full-gap 0.122 * J[Hz]     = 70.8 Hz
(3) 0.061 * 2pi * J[Hz]        = 222.3 Hz
(4) 0.122 * 2pi * J[Hz]        = 444.6 Hz
Paper claims: 72 Hz
Closest single-convention candidates to 72:
   0.061*J                  =    35.4 Hz   (ratio to 72 = 0.49)
   0.122*J (full gap)       =    70.8 Hz   (ratio to 72 = 0.98)
   0.061*2pi*J              =   222.3 Hz   (ratio to 72 = 3.09)
   0.122*2pi*J              =   444.6 Hz   (ratio to 72 = 6.17)

Supporting files