Round 2 verification audit for C036

Model: gpt-5

Claim: Drive (A) produces a dipole AC Stark shift of ~= 2 pi x 17 kHz.

Source alignment: source/main.tex:157-157 (Experimental error analysis)

Prior official verdict: partial with failure_reason None.

Executable evidence: run.py. Sandbox rerun logs: run.log.

Independent audit: I scanned the copied script for imports/shared helper dependencies and reran it through the sandbox. The code is self-contained in this attempt directory and targets the claim strategy: Paper-reported value; check consistency with the 729 nm intensity/detuning regime stated for drive (A).. I checked the relevant family model rather than relying only on exit status; the rerun is treated as one reproducibility input.

Decision: Round 2 verdict is partial with failure_reason None and limitations ['paper_text_only']. Notes: Paper: drive (A) dipole AC Stark shift ~= 2 pi x 17 kHz (main line 157). The carrier AC Stark shift depends on the actual 729 nm intensity and detunings from the relevant carrier transitions, which are not fully specified, so it cannot be reconstructed from first principles. Consistency bounds: (1) the paper-reported differential Stark shift between the two ions is 2 pi x 2.5 kHz (main line 122); 2.5/17 ~= 15% implied per-ion intensity imbalance, physically reasonable for two-ion addressing. (2) With drive (A) Omega = 2 pi x 265 kHz (supp), the AC-Stark estimate Omega^2/(4 Delta) = 17 kHz implies an effective carrier detuning Delta ~= 2 pi x 1.0 MHz, a plausible detuning to nearby transitions. The 17 kHz value is consistent in scale but not exactly reconstructable -> partial, provenance paper_text_only.